Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1875
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobert Ferguson
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:02:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:02:29Z-
dc.date.issued2013-04-30
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1875-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractIn Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition contracts, there are often concerns of security and competitive advantage making it difficult to find comparable performance data that may be useful in evaluating contractor proposals. In order for programs to make such comparative evaluations, a should-cost analysis may be conducted. This analysis can be compared to a benchmarking process provided that a benchmark database is available. Parametric estimation tools provide this type of data. This paper shows how SEER-SEM was applied as part of the should-cost effort on the F-22 program. The Office of the Secretary of Defense recognized the resulting $32 million savings in the presentation on Better Buying Power II.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBetter Buying Power
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSYM-CE-13-054
dc.subjectBetter Buying Power
dc.subjectShould Cost
dc.subjectSensitivity Analysis
dc.titleSoftware Should-Cost Analysis with Parametric Estimation Tools
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-CE-13-054.pdf88.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.