Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/5454
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhilip J. Candreva, David Kaczorowski-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-15T21:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-15T21:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-15-
dc.identifier.citationAPA 7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/5454-
dc.descriptionCase Studyen_US
dc.description.abstractThere are several normative theories for how the costs of running a coalition military operation or sustaining an alliance should be distributed among the members. The reality is that this becomes a matter of diplomacy and negotiation. This case study has students allocate the burden of a five-member military coalition using three approaches: ability to pay, capacity to contribute, and a complex qualitative approach based on a risk-sharing theory and incorporating descriptions of the member nations and their leaders. The case could be used in courses in national security policy, public budgeting, international affairs, or political science. It illustrates theories of alliances, conceptions of fairness, monetary and non-monetary costs of participation in such endeavors, and the effects of political ideologies on such decisions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipARPen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition Management;NPS-AM-25-479-
dc.subjectallianceen_US
dc.subjectburden sharingen_US
dc.subjectmilitary expenditureen_US
dc.titleCase Study: International Burden Sharing in Alliances & Coalitionsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-25-479.pdfCase Study455.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.