A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of a Three Pattern Family of Uniforms for the USMC

Abstract

In the face of a potential conflict with a peer threat, U.S. forces seek out new ways to mask physical and electronic signatures in a battlespace to avoid the enemy targeting cycle. This practice, called signature management, teaches American warfighters the importance of blending into their surroundings. At the most basic level, the camouflage uniform aids service members in signature management by offering physical concealment. The U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) currently has a two-pattern family for camouflage: woodland and desert. However, the USMC has no pattern for transitional environments that exist on a 21st century battlefield. This thesis provides a cost-effectiveness analysis to fielding a three-family pattern of camouflage to the USMC. In doing so, this research seeks to ensure the lethality, survivability, and effectiveness of Marines in the future fight. This research paper uses standard cost estimating and cost effectiveness practices to provide valuable insights to decision makers. It establishes an objective, logical evaluation model pitting warfighter effectiveness against cost in five courses of action. The results of this analysis find that any of the proposed courses of action result in increased effectiveness for the warfighter while costs vary above and below the status quo. This research paper is recommended for use in buying decision trade space for stakeholders when they consider numerous courses of action for future uniforms.